Solar system vs nuclear system

 The topic of our discussion was "Should we use solar system instead of nuclear system?".

 Before discussion, Ashley, Lucy, and I, Sara were agree with this.

 These are their reason: Ashley said that of course we need high cost to introduce to solar system, though a long run, the cost is cheaper than nuclear's one. And Lucy also think solar system is cheaper and safe for nature because solar system has no risk of environmental pollution. Then my reason was nuclear system has heavy risks of air pollution if happen accident and break nuclear system, especially it can damages human's health.

 On the other hand, Sophie and Emily were disagree with this topic.

 For one of the reason, Sophie said solar system need big place, so if we introduce it, we should cut many rare plants which is influential for economy of Apollon. And Emily said she was singer and need a lot of power for stage performance, though solar system depends on the weather, so she worried about that can we make enough energy for us by solar system.


 In the discussion, Lucy worried about that their children can have risks of their lives. I thought so too, and it's important point. We should be careful about present our resource so that people can live as comfortably as possible in the future.

 One points of Ashley contributed to the discussion was her searching skill. In the short break time she checked both of solar and nuclear system's maintain cost, so we could say that both system need about same amount of money, and it's not big problem.

 And Sophie's good point was talked about Apollon's economy. Surely wet mainly get money by foreigner tourist, therefore if we lose rare plants or beautiful forest to make spaces for solar panels, the number of tourist will decrease. It affects us.

 Then Emily, her question was very nice. "Who will pay the money for solar system?" To introduce and maintain we need a lot of money, so it's important problem. I answered everyone use energy for our life, so we should pay by tax or charity, but I now how did her think about my answer.

 Finally, most contributed to our discussion was Isabella. She always summarize our opinion after we said our opinion, therefore I could each person's opinions understand well, and when I couldn't tell what I wanted tell people because I didn't know how should I say, she helped me. She really tried to listen to our opinions, moreover she gave us some questions and chance to think deeply.


 In the end of the discussion, our conclusion was that we keep the present condition until we find other better system of energy, and we will try to reduce the power of nuclear.
 Through our discussion, I thought it's not heated. But it's may not bad, because each opinion are sure. One problem was we sometimes talked in Japanese, so we should practice to tell what we want to say.

 This discussion was effective. The reason why is that at first sight, our condition seems not change, though we think about other energy and we noticed that fundamentally we must reduce and save power energy. We found new idea through the discussion, so I think it was effective.